Choose YNAB if...

  • You want a guided budgeting methodology
  • You need native mobile apps (iOS/Android)
  • You prefer a polished, dedicated budgeting UI
  • You want goal tracking and reports built-in
FeatureSheetLinkYNAB
Price$14.99/month or $109/year
Free Tier
34-day trial
PlatformWeb + iOS + Android
Bank Sync
via Plaid
Budgeting MethodologyZero-based budgeting (4 rules)
Mobile Apps
Native iOS/Android
Goal Tracking
Built-in goals
Reports & AnalyticsPre-built spending reports
Business Bookkeeping
Personal only
Spreadsheet Flexibility
App-only
Learning CurveLow (guided workflow)
Customer SupportEmail + extensive docs + community

YNAB

Or $109/year ($9.08/month)

  • Unlimited accounts and budgets
  • Full mobile and web access
  • 34-day free trial (no credit card)
  • Free for college students (1 year)
Visit YNAB

Annual Cost Comparison:

YNAB: $109/year (monthly) or $109/year (annual plan) | SheetLink: $0/year (free tier) to $24/year (Basic, 2 banks) to $120/year (Pro, 1 bank) |Savings: $85-109/year with SheetLink for basic use

With SheetLink, your financial data lives in Google Sheets - giving you unlimited flexibility. Build custom charts, pivot tables, forecasting models, or complex analyses that no budgeting app can match. Perfect for power users, data analysts, or anyone who wants complete control over their financial tracking.

YNAB is designed exclusively for personal budgeting. SheetLink works for both personal finance and business use cases. Freelancers, contractors, and small business owners use SheetLink to track business expenses, build P&L statements, and categorize transactions for tax time - all in Google Sheets.

SheetLink costs 75-85% less than YNAB. For someone tracking 2-3 bank accounts, SheetLink costs $24-48/year (Basic) vs YNAB's $109/year. The free tier (7 days of history) is perfect for weekly budget tracking with zero cost. If budget is a concern, SheetLink is the clear winner.

If you're comfortable with spreadsheets, SheetLink feels natural. You already know how to sort, filter, create formulas, and build charts. No need to learn a new budgeting app's interface or methodology - just use the spreadsheet skills you already have.

You Want a Structured Budgeting System

YNAB's "Four Rules" methodology is powerful for people who struggle with budgeting. The app guides you through zero-based budgeting, age of money tracking, and goal-based savings. If you need structure and accountability, YNAB's opinionated approach is better than SheetLink's blank-slate flexibility.

You Need Mobile Apps with Real-Time Updates

YNAB has excellent iOS and Android apps that sync in real-time. Enter transactions on your phone while shopping, check budget categories at the register, and see your budget update instantly across devices. While Google Sheets has mobile apps, YNAB's are purpose-built for budgeting and offer a superior mobile experience.

You Don't Want to Build Your Own Budget

SheetLink gives you transaction data - you build everything else. YNAB gives you a complete budgeting system out of the box: pre-built category structures, automatic rollover between months, goal tracking, and spending reports. If you'd rather use a finished product than DIY in spreadsheets, YNAB saves setup time.

You Want World-Class Support and Community

YNAB has extensive documentation, video tutorials, workshops, and an active user community. Their customer support is highly rated. YNAB also offers free workshops to help you master their methodology. SheetLink is newer with smaller community and support resources.

In YNAB, go to your budget and export transactions as CSV. This preserves your historical spending data, categories, and memos. You can import this into Google Sheets to maintain historical continuity.

Add SheetLink from the Chrome Web Store. Use the free tier (7 days of transactions) to test it alongside YNAB before canceling your subscription. Connect your banks via Plaid - the same service YNAB uses.

Create a Google Sheet with your budget categories. SheetLink syncs transaction data to dedicated tabs. Use formulas like SUMIFS to categorize spending, pivot tables for reports, and charts for visualization. Check SheetLink's Recipes for pre-built templates.

Manually recreate your budget categories and spending limits in Sheets. You'll lose YNAB's automatic rollover, goal tracking, and age-of-money features - these need to be rebuilt with formulas. This is the biggest friction point when switching.

Once your SheetLink budget is working, cancel your YNAB subscription. You'll save $85-100+/year depending on your plan. Keep your YNAB export for reference, but your new transactions will flow through SheetLink.

Important Note:

YNAB's methodology (Four Rules, goal tracking, age of money) won't transfer to SheetLink. You'll need to rebuild these workflows manually in Google Sheets using formulas. If you heavily rely on YNAB's structured approach, the transition will require significant setup work.

YNAB is a full-featured budgeting app with its own methodology, mobile apps, and guided approach. SheetLink syncs bank transactions to Google Sheets, giving you spreadsheet flexibility to build your own budgets and analyses. YNAB costs $14.99/month, while SheetLink costs $2-10/month with a free tier.

Yes, significantly. YNAB costs $14.99/month or $109/year. SheetLink costs $2-10/month depending on features needed, with a free tier for 7 days of transaction history. For most users, SheetLink is 75-85% cheaper than YNAB.

It depends on your needs. YNAB provides a structured budgeting methodology, mobile apps, and pre-built workflows. SheetLink gives you raw transaction data in Google Sheets - you build your own budgets using formulas and spreadsheet features. If you want structure and guidance, choose YNAB. If you want flexibility and lower cost, choose SheetLink.

No. SheetLink is a Chrome extension that syncs bank data to Google Sheets. You access your data through Google Sheets (which has mobile apps). YNAB has dedicated iOS and Android apps with budgeting features built in. If mobile-first budgeting is important, YNAB is better suited.

Last updated: February 2026